Research Feeds

View All
1H NMR- based metabolomics approaches as non-invasive tools for diagnosis of endometriosis A Comparative Study of Blood Levels of Manganese, Some Macroelements and Heavy Metals in Obese and Non-Obese Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients A Comparative Study of the Gut Microbiota Associated With Immunoglobulin a Nephropathy and Membranous Nephropathy A comparative study of the gut microbiota in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases-does a common dysbiosis exist? A comprehensive analysis of breast cancer microbiota and host gene expression A comprehensive analysis of breast cancer microbiota and host gene expression A cross-sectional analysis about bacterial vaginosis, high-risk human papillomavirus infection, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Chinese women A cross-sectional pilot study of birth mode and vaginal microbiota in reproductive-age women A metabonomics approach as a means for identification of potentialbiomarkers for early diagnosis of endometriosis A More Diverse Cervical Microbiome Associates with Better Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Endometriosis: A Pilot Study A Multi-Omic Systems-Based Approach Reveals Metabolic Markers of Bacterial Vaginosis and Insight into the Disease A New Approach to Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: The Gut Microbiota A Review of the Anti-inflammatory Properties of Clindamycin in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Premenstrual Syndrome with Special Emphasis on Herbal Medicine and Nutritional Supplements. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet, Dietary Patterns and Body Composition in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
How Chlorhexidine Mouthwash May Contribute to Breast Cancer

STOP: Indiscriminate Chlorhexidine Mouthwash Use Due to Breast Cancer Risk

Researched by:

  • Karen Pendergrass ID
    Karen Pendergrass

    User avatarKaren Pendergrass is a microbiome researcher specializing in microbiome-targeted interventions (MBTIs). She systematically analyzes scientific literature to identify microbial patterns, develop hypotheses, and validate interventions. As the founder of the Microbiome Signatures Database, she bridges microbiome research with clinical practice. In 2012, based on her own investigative research, she became the first documented case of FMT for Celiac Disease—four years before the first published case study.

May 19, 2025

Microbiome findings provide mechanistic insights into how chlorhexidine (HX) mouthwash might contribute to breast cancer and breast disease in a causal manner.

research-feed Research feed

Researched by:

  • Karen Pendergrass ID
    Karen Pendergrass

    User avatarKaren Pendergrass is a microbiome researcher specializing in microbiome-targeted interventions (MBTIs). She systematically analyzes scientific literature to identify microbial patterns, develop hypotheses, and validate interventions. As the founder of the Microbiome Signatures Database, she bridges microbiome research with clinical practice. In 2012, based on her own investigative research, she became the first documented case of FMT for Celiac Disease—four years before the first published case study.

Last Updated: January 3, 2025

Microbiome Signatures identifies and validates condition-specific microbiome shifts and interventions to accelerate clinical translation. Our multidisciplinary team supports clinicians, researchers, and innovators in turning microbiome science into actionable medicine.

Karen Pendergrass

Karen Pendergrass is a microbiome researcher specializing in microbiome-targeted interventions (MBTIs). She systematically analyzes scientific literature to identify microbial patterns, develop hypotheses, and validate interventions. As the founder of the Microbiome Signatures Database, she bridges microbiome research with clinical practice. In 2012, based on her own investigative research, she became the first documented case of FMT for Celiac Disease—four years before the first published case study.

Overview

Research shows that women with periodontal disease or tooth loss due to chronic gum infections are more than twice as likely to develop breast cancer compared to those with healthy gums.[1][2] However, the following body of evidence highlights the need to reassess the widespread use of antimicrobial oral products like chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash, particularly in healthy individuals, as its use may carry unintended downstream risks. Emerging findings provide potential mechanistic insights into how CHX use might contribute to breast cancer and breast disease in a causal manner, warranting careful consideration of its routine application. Specifically:

How Chlorhexidine Mouthwash May Contribute to Breast Cancer

Routine use of chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash may inadvertently contribute to breast cancer pathogenesis through a cascade of microbiome disruptions. At the core of this concern is the induction of oral microbial dysbiosis, characterized by the depletion of protective anaerobes and the overgrowth of Proteobacteria—an opportunistic phylum disproportionately enriched in breast tumor tissue. These microbial shifts mirror those observed in antibiotic exposure, implicating CHX in similar mechanisms of immune perturbation and systemic inflammation. Furthermore, mounting evidence points to a strong oral-gut microbial axis in breast cancer patients, suggesting that disturbances in the oral microbiome may have far-reaching effects beyond the oral cavity. Together, these findings highlight a biologically plausible, mechanistically supported risk pathway that challenges the continued, indiscriminate use of CHX in healthy individuals:

1. Microbial Dysbiosis and Breast Cancer

Studies show that CHX significantly reduces key pathogenic genera such as Porphyromonas and Fusobacterium in the oral cavity.[3] In studies, these two pathogenic genera were found to be inversely correlated with the oral microbiome in breast cancer patients, leading researchers to speculate that these common oral pathogens may play a protective role. [4]

2. Promotion of Proteobacteria

CHX promotes the growth of Proteobacteria, a phylum that is the most enriched in breast tumor tissues.[5]Proteobacteria blooms are also associated with antibiotic use, with some literature even proposing that antibiotics may potentially play a causal role in the condition.[6] This microbial shift appears conducive to tumorigenesis, and this connection suggests that chlorhexidine CHX could create a microbiome signature linked to breast cancer.

3. Antibiotic Effects

CHX acts as an antibiotic, and its effects parallel findings that patients with breast cancer and non-malignant breast disease are more likely to have recently taken antibiotics in the past 30 days relative to controls.[7][8] This highlights a potential role for microbial disruption in the etiology of these diseases, possibly mediated by systemic inflammation or immune dysregulation.

4. Oral-Fecal Microbiome Connection

The strong correlation between the oral and fecal microbiomes in breast cancer cases suggests that disruptions in the oral microbiome, such as those caused by CHX, might have downstream effects on gut microbiota.

Implications and Recommendations for Clinical Practice

Although a causal relationship has been suggested, the current evidence does not establish a causal relationship. Nonetheless, the consistent associations between CHX use and breast disease raise legitimate concerns about its potential role in disrupting microbial homeostasis and contributing to systemic pathologies. These findings justify urgent prospective research to clarify the long-term effects of CHX on microbial ecosystems and cancer risk. In the interim, routine use of CHX should be restricted to clearly defined clinical indications—such as acute gingivitis or periodontitis—rather than as a blanket approach to oral hygiene. Clinical emphasis should shift toward microbiome-preserving strategies, including the promotion of nitrate-rich diets, prebiotic toothpaste, and probiotic-oriented oral care. Finally, research-driven guidelines are needed to appropriately balance CHX’s short-term benefits against its potential systemic risks, particularly in populations vulnerable to breast pathology.

Research Feed

A comprehensive analysis of breast cancer microbiota and host gene expression
November 30, 2017
/
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer

Did You Know?

The Left Breast Is Slightly More Susceptible. Breast cancer is about 5–10% more common in the left breast than the right. Researchers are still exploring why this asymmetry exists.

The study analyzed breast tumor and adjacent tissues, linking microbiota composition to cancer pathways. Key findings implicate specific microbes in breast cancer progression.

What Was Studied?

This study investigated the microbial composition of breast tumor tissues compared to non-cancerous adjacent (NCA) tissues, focusing on identifying specific microbiota associated with different breast cancer subtypes. The research utilized RNA sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), analyzing microbial reads and their association with host gene expression profiles to explore the role of the tumor microbiota in breast cancer pathogenesis.

Who Was Studied?

The study involved 668 breast tumor tissue samples and 72 NCA samples. The samples were filtered to exclude male patients, metastatic cases, and individuals with a history of breast cancer or neoadjuvant therapy, ensuring a robust cohort for microbial and host gene analysis.

What Were the Most Important Findings?

The study identified distinct microbial signatures between tumor and NCA tissues. Proteobacteria were significantly enriched in tumor samples, while Actinobacteria were more prevalent in NCA tissues. Specific microbial taxa, such as Haemophilus influenzae, were associated with genes involved in tumor-promoting pathways, including the G2M checkpoint, E2F transcription factors, and mitotic spindle assembly. Similarly, Listeria fleischmannii correlated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition pathways, a hallmark of cancer metastasis.

Twelve of the most abundant species, including Escherichia coli, Mycobacterium fortuitum, and Salmonella enterica, showed significant differential abundance between tumor and NCA tissues. These species are notable for their potential roles in DNA damage and estrogen metabolism, contributing to genomic instability and hormonal dysregulation in breast cancer. The findings also revealed that less prevalent taxa often showed the most significant differential abundance, highlighting the challenges of detecting meaningful microbial shifts in underpowered studies.

What Are the Greatest Implications of This Study?

This research underscores the complex interplay between the tumor microbiota and host gene expression in breast cancer. The enrichment of specific microbial taxa in tumor tissues and their associations with oncogenic pathways suggest that the microbiota may play an active role in breast cancer progression. These findings open avenues for microbiota-targeted interventions and diagnostic tools based on microbial markers. Furthermore, the study highlights the need for large-scale, well-controlled cohorts to accurately characterize the tumor microbiome and its clinical relevance.

Breast Cancer

Traditionally linked to genetic predispositions and environmental exposures, emerging evidence highlights the microbiome as a critical and underappreciated factor influencing breast cancer progression, immune response, and treatment outcomes.

References

  1. Oral health links breast cancer.. Saini R.. (J Pharm Bioallied Sci. Jul 3, 2011)
  2. Periodontal disease may associate with breast cancer.. Söder B, Yakob M, Meurman JH, Andersson LC, Klinge B, Söder PÖ.. (Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011)
  3. Effects of chlorhexidine mouthwash on the oral microbiome.. Brookes ZLS, Belfield LA, Ashworth A, Casas-Agustench P, Raja M, Pollard AJ, Bescos R.. (J Dent. August 18 2021)
  4. The oral microbiome and breast cancer and nonmalignant breast disease, and its relationship with the fecal microbiome in the Ghana Breast Health Study.. Wu Z, Byrd DA, Wan Y, Ansong D, Clegg-Lamptey JN, Wiafe-Addai B, Edusei L, Adjei E, Titiloye N, et al.. (Int J Cancer. Oct 15, 2022)
  5. A comprehensive analysis of breast cancer microbiota and host gene expression.. Thompson KJ, Ingle JN, Tang X, Chia N, Jeraldo PR, Walther-Antonio MR, Kandimalla KK, Johnson S, Yao JZ, Harrington SC, Suman VJ, Wang L, Weinshilboum RL, Boughey JC, Kocher JP, Nelson H, Goetz MP, Kalari KR.. (PLoS One. Nov 30, 2017)
  6. Antibiotic use in relation to the risk of breast cancer.. Velicer CM, Heckbert SR, Lampe JW, Potter JD, Robertson CA, Taplin SH.. (JAMA. 2004)
  7. The oral microbiome and breast cancer and nonmalignant breast disease, and its relationship with the fecal microbiome in the Ghana Breast Health Study.. Wu Z, Byrd DA, Wan Y, Ansong D, Clegg-Lamptey JN, Wiafe-Addai B, Edusei L, Adjei E, Titiloye N, et al.. (Int J Cancer. Oct 15, 2022)
  8. The Unknown Effect of Antibiotic-Induced Dysbiosis on the Gut Microbiota. Aleksandr Birg, Nathaniel L. Ritz, Henry C. Lin. (Microbiome and Metabolome in Diagnosis, Therapy, and other Strategic Applications, Academic Press, 2019.)

Saini R.

Oral health links breast cancer.

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. Jul 3, 2011

Söder B, Yakob M, Meurman JH, Andersson LC, Klinge B, Söder PÖ.

Periodontal disease may associate with breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011

Brookes ZLS, Belfield LA, Ashworth A, Casas-Agustench P, Raja M, Pollard AJ, Bescos R.

Effects of chlorhexidine mouthwash on the oral microbiome.

J Dent. August 18 2021

Wu Z, Byrd DA, Wan Y, Ansong D, Clegg-Lamptey JN, Wiafe-Addai B, Edusei L, Adjei E, Titiloye N, et al.

The oral microbiome and breast cancer and nonmalignant breast disease, and its relationship with the fecal microbiome in the Ghana Breast Health Study.

Int J Cancer. Oct 15, 2022

Thompson KJ, Ingle JN, Tang X, Chia N, Jeraldo PR, Walther-Antonio MR, Kandimalla KK, Johnson S, Yao JZ, Harrington SC, Suman VJ, Wang L, Weinshilboum RL, Boughey JC, Kocher JP, Nelson H, Goetz MP, Kalari KR.

A comprehensive analysis of breast cancer microbiota and host gene expression.

PLoS One. Nov 30, 2017

Read Review

Velicer CM, Heckbert SR, Lampe JW, Potter JD, Robertson CA, Taplin SH.

Antibiotic use in relation to the risk of breast cancer.

JAMA. 2004

Wu Z, Byrd DA, Wan Y, Ansong D, Clegg-Lamptey JN, Wiafe-Addai B, Edusei L, Adjei E, Titiloye N, et al.

The oral microbiome and breast cancer and nonmalignant breast disease, and its relationship with the fecal microbiome in the Ghana Breast Health Study.

Int J Cancer. Oct 15, 2022

Aleksandr Birg, Nathaniel L. Ritz, Henry C. Lin

The Unknown Effect of Antibiotic-Induced Dysbiosis on the Gut Microbiota

Microbiome and Metabolome in Diagnosis, Therapy, and other Strategic Applications, Academic Press, 2019.

Join the Roundtable

Contribute to published consensus reports, connect with top clinicians and researchers, and receive exclusive invitations to roundtable conferences.